Training or chaos. The U.S.–Mexico border’s security is decided in the classroom

Border security is no longer defined solely by walls or equipment; it is determined in classrooms, simulators, and forensic labs. 2025 began under unprecedented pressure from fentanyl and its precursors, shifting migration flows, and increasingly tech-driven criminal networks. In this context, the professionalization of border officials customs agents, members of the National Guard, state and local police is the true dividing line between a resilient border and a high-risk corridor.

In the United States, 2024 sent a clear signal: demand for training skyrocketed, but capacity was strained. The Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers (FLETC) reported a 32% increase in training requests from state, local, and tribal officers in FY 2024 (24,923), yet it was only able to fulfill 45% of them (11,246), compared to 54% in 2023. In absolute terms, more officers were trained than the previous year, but the gap between need and delivery widened. The greatest shortfalls were in mission-critical programs for the border tactical medicine, active shooter response, and advanced investigations highlighting bottlenecks precisely where seconds matter most. At the same time, perceived training quality remained high: in 2023, 98% of partner organizations expressed satisfaction with instruction, and 100% with counter-drug courses a benchmark 2024 sought to maintain through curriculum upgrades and infrastructure improvements.

Mexico also made moves in 2024. The National Customs Agency of Mexico (ANAM) trained 8,082 people in 2022 and 8,996 in 2023 an 11% year-over-year increase and during 2024 added specialized modules (CITES, gender equality, human rights) along with technical workshops in the first half of the year, professionalizing sensitive areas such as handling protected species and gender-sensitive procedures at inspection points. Beyond customs, systemic police professionalization advanced: by March 2024, Mexico reported 390,694 Single Police Certificates (CUP), equivalent to 75.7% of the total 515,862 officers (59% federal, 88.4% state, 78.9% municipal), plus 16,301 continuing education programs since 2019 focusing on first responders, forensic science, and human rights. An increase in the Public Security Fund (FASP) budget by 25.7% bolstered this standardization.

The technological front demands an even steeper learning curve. In 2024, CBP’s Office of Field Operations piloted canines trained to detect fentanyl precursors, xylazine, and ketamine, while its canine unit operating with 536 dogs made decisive contributions to synthetic opioid seizures. This confirms that the convergence of biological capabilities (canines) and technical analytics (laboratories, traceability) is now a core training component, not an add-on. At the same time, a 2025 DHS audit stressed that ports of entry risk missing contraband without stronger operational guidance and improved use of non-intrusive inspection systems. In plain terms: more training hours, sharper protocols, and performance metrics on actual scan usage are needed.

Institutional developments in 2024–2025 also directly shaped the professional culture. CBP launched specific training to safeguard investigative independence (Objectivity and Independence) and updated governance on external training to ensure relevance and learning traceability. In 2025, it added guidelines to expand mandatory e-learning, useful for closing gaps in remote border regions. On the academic side, institutions such as UTEP and the University of Arizona strengthened research-training ecosystems on behavior, risk, and security along the border an essential bridge between evidence and applied instruction.

What do these 2024 numbers tell us? That there was progress in both scale and specialization, but with asymmetries. In the U.S., absolute capacity increased, but the service rate fell from 54% to 45%, exposing shortages of instructors, facilities, and logistics for critical topics. In Mexico, standardization via the CUP and thematic expansion reached scale (three out of four officers certified), yet debates persist over the command structure and civilian nature of the National Guard, and over the need to sustain professionalization over time with controls and comparable metrics at state and municipal levels.

The year 2025 opens with three key challenges to unlocking potential. First, capacity and relevance: FLETC and Mexican academies must align enrollment, schedules, and curricula with the highest-return threats (fentanyl, human trafficking, and firearms), closing the 55% U.S. service gap and measuring operational impact not just classroom hours. Second, interoperability and technology: cross-training canine teams, forensic analysts, and non-intrusive inspection operators, with shared protocols and audits of actual usage, as urged by the OIG. Third, human rights and legitimacy: embedding content on use of force, bias, and victim care in both countries, and ensuring that professionalization backed by the CUP and the new 2024–2030 National Public Security Strategy translates into public trust and smooth binational cooperation at ports of entry.

If the border is to remain secure without stifling trade or lawful mobility, the great multiplier will not be more hardware, but more and better training with shared metrics. In 2025, the strategic imperative is not to teach “more of the same,” but to teach the right skills, to the right people, at the right time and to prove it with results.

Written by: Editorial

#SecurityWithEvidence

#SmartBorder

#BinationalTraining

#CUPandTrust

#TechWithRights