Mexico Is Aging. The Country That Did Not Make It Easy to Have Children
- Editorial
- 3 days ago
- 5 min read
Mexico spent decades understanding family planning as a policy to have fewer children. At the time, it made sense: the country was younger, more rural, with larger households and insufficient public services. The message was clear: fewer births meant more opportunities.
The problem is that no one prepared the country for the day after.
Today, having children is no longer just a family decision. It is an economic, labor, urban and deeply social decision. For millions of young people, starting a family means rent, a mortgage, daycare, transportation, school, safety, impossible schedules and fragile jobs.
Mexico did not stop having children because young people became selfish. It stopped having them because it became increasingly difficult to imagine a life in which having children was viable.
The bill has already arrived
The data show a trend that cannot be ignored. In 2024, Mexico registered 1,672,227 births, with a rate of 47.7 registered births per thousand women ages 15 to 49, according to INEGI. The figure confirms a decline that can no longer be read as a temporary adjustment, but as a structural change.
CONAPO estimated a total fertility rate of 1.89 daughters or sons per woman for 2024. At the same time, demographic projections warn that by 2034, the population aged 60 and older will equal the population aged 0 to 11. The breaking point is not in some abstract future. It is less than a decade away.
You can listen to this article here:
By 2050, the population over 60 could reach 35.4 million people, equivalent to 24.1% of the total population. In other words, one in every four people in Mexico will be an older adult.
The consequence will not only be fewer children. There will be more older adults, fewer young people entering the labor market, greater pressure on health systems, more demand for care and a family burden that will become increasingly difficult to sustain.
A city that ages without young people does not only lose population. It loses consumption, workforce, innovation, social energy and economic future.
It is not a crisis of values. It is a crisis of conditions
The mistake would be to turn this debate into an accusation against young people. Saying that “they no longer want to commit” is convenient, but incomplete. Many do want to start a family. What they do not see is solid ground on which to do it.
A young couple may have two incomes and still be unable to afford decent housing. They may have degrees and still live with job uncertainty. They may want a child and postpone it year after year because life never quite settles into place.
Having children has become a silent luxury. Not because raising children was ever easy, but because today the support points have weakened: affordable housing, stable jobs, safe neighborhoods, nearby schools, available time and close family networks.
The problem is not a lack of desire for family. The problem is that family no longer fits into the economic model of many young Mexicans.
The new family planning must change the question
Mexico must not abandon reproductive health, sex education or access to contraception. That would be a step backward. But it does need to broaden the conversation.
Family planning in the 21st century cannot be limited to preventing unwanted pregnancies. It must also help ensure that chosen motherhood and fatherhood do not lead to precarity.
This is not about pressuring women. It is not about romanticizing motherhood. It is not about demanding sacrifices from a generation already carrying low wages, high rents and economic anxiety.
It is about building conditions.
Accessible daycare. Real parental leave. Work schedules compatible with raising children. Housing for young families. Safe transportation. Extended school hours. Public spaces that do not push childhood out. Companies that do not punish motherhood or exclude active fatherhood.
A country that needs children, but abandons those who raise them, is sabotaging its own future.
Where demography becomes daily life
The demographic crisis can be discussed through national charts, but it is lived in every neighborhood.
It can be seen in the school that reduces class groups, in the neighborhood where children are rarely seen playing anymore, in the older adult who lives alone, in the family that cannot find a nearby childcare center, in the couple that postpones having a child because their salary is not enough, in the transportation that consumes hours that should be spent together.
You can view this article here:
That is why modern family policy does not begin with speeches. It begins with territorial data and concrete decisions.
Where are fewer children being born? Where are older adults concentrated? Which neighborhoods are pushing young people out because of a lack of housing? Which work areas have no nearby daycare options? Which families live too far from school, work and basic services?
The answers to those questions define much more than a statistic. They define whether a city can remain livable for those who want to build a future.
Mexico needs a family policy, not a birthrate campaign
A birthrate campaign can sound like an imposition. A modern family policy speaks of freedom, conditions and future.
Mexico should not tell young people how many children to have. It must build a country where having children does not mean giving up a career, going into lifelong debt, losing job stability or living in fear of the next bill.
Without children, there is no generational replacement. Without young people, there is not enough workforce. Without families with the right conditions, there is no strong domestic market. Without care, there is no productivity. Without livable cities, there is no sustainable country.
Mexico is aging. But the problem is not aging. The real problem is reaching that future without having built the conditions for new generations to want to stay, work, start families and raise children here.
The country still has time, but not much. Demography does not change through speeches. It changes when a young couple can afford housing, when a mother is not punished for working, when a father can care without asking permission from workplace culture, when a city stops treating families as a burden and begins to see them as part of its future.
For years, Mexico asked how many children a family should have.
Perhaps it is time to ask the question the other way around: What kind of country have we built if having children is beginning to look like a privilege and not a life possibility?
Written by: Editorial
Comments